While the whole world is panicking about the new variant of COVID-19, and since in my previous articles we had insinuated the possibility of a variant coming from either Asia or Africa, for which we have also provided adequate rationale in the same. Today, we will be talking mostly about the new variant and what we know about it few parts of this article are taken from various resources, which will be cited at the end.
What we know
While apart from knowing that the virus is highly
mutated and probably has high virulence the experts seem to have no further
idea as there is not enough data to support their hypothesis nay theories, “what we know so far is just a miniscule
about the virus and since there is no data to suggest that it is more infectious
and more harmful, and to say so would be too early” Dr shahid jameel
(virologist).
Another report says “Omicron, the SARS-CoV-2 variant responsible
for a cluster of cases in South Africa and that is now spreading around the
world, is the most heavily mutated variant to emerge so far and carries
mutations similar to changes seen in previous variants of concern associated
with enhanced transmissibility and partial resistance to vaccine induced
immunity.” (Full article)
Lawrence Young, a virologist and professor
of molecular oncology at Warwick Medical School, said, “This new variant of theCOVID-199 virus is very worrying. This variant carries some changes we’ve seen
previously in other variants, but never altogether in one virus. It also has
novel mutations that we’ve not seen before.”
In total, the variant’s genome has around 50 mutations, including more
than 30 in the spike protein, the part that interacts with human cells before
cell entry and that has been the primary target for current vaccines.
(lbid.)
Worrying factor
One of the omicron variant’s
mutations leads to “S gene target failure” (or “S gene dropout”), meaning that
one of several areas of the gene that are targeted by PCR testing gives a false
negative. This can be used as a “surrogate marker,” allowing genome sequencing
to be targeted, Peacock said, particularly where circulating strains are
predominantly S gene positive, as is the case with the delta variant (ibid)
Personal Analysis
While the experts have reasons to
believe that the virus and its mutation might be non-lethal as there is no
reported serious case of omicron world-wide, but the possibility that the virus
is much more lethal than its previous variants still persists, the reason to
say so it that when a virus mutates there are n number of mutations happening
in them and not all of them are virulent and dangerous, the one that are weak
are dead the moment they are conceived and only the stronger once are passed
out. Having established the theory of levels and how mutation gets stronger in
my previous articles it is much evident that only viruses which are better in
any terms than the previous ones are passed out, having said that and to
believe in the theory we have all reasons to believe that the variant is must
more potential than any of its previous versions.
While the people out there might
ask do they have to worry if they are vaccinated, well the answer in that
scenario might be a little tricky as there are a few possibilities and to list
them out we have to consider various variables into account, to simplify it and
understand better let us take these scenarios in cases.
Case 1:
Let us say that the candidate is fully
vaccinated and he has a good immunity, takes good care of body and fitness (in
a nutshell s/he is a fitness freak), and since it is an established the fact that
vaccination is just an addition to your own immunity and can never be replaced
by human immunity, we know, in this case the vaccination will be effective
enough, the person might get sick and not know at all while still being a
carrier. Which is still a bit scary as s/he can be a carrier but be affected by
it. In this case, the candidate will be safe and sound, and s/he has nothing to
worry about.
Case 2:
Let us assume that the immunity
of this candidate is compromised but s/he take full precaution and is
relatively fit than their average counterpart, in such a case the immune
response of the individual might be a little compromised, but would still wouldn’t
take the individual to a grave danger due to his/her lifestyle. But, there is a
chance that it might mutate and adapt to the new change and mutate, and in such a
case, the chances are that the virus might gain immunity to vaccination and may
reduce the efficacy of vaccination by a major point.
Case 3:
Let us assume that the candidate
is fully immunocompromised and has a lot of co-morbidities, and is completely ignorant
towards them, and s/he is just more ignorant. It will be easier for the
virus to enter and do serious harm to the said person. In such cases, destruction might be inevitable; the survival chances of such a candidate, irrespective of age, might be seriously compromised.
Case 4:
Age factor, while all of the
scientist are trying to find a relation of the virus with age clusters vis age
groups of 0-5, 5-12, 12-18, 20-45 and 45+, while the approach to figure such
relation is a standard operating procedure and is a necessary step to do, we
fail to realize that in the view of the virus there are no such boundaries, the
virus is not intelligent enough to demarcate age relations but it responds and
mutates on the level of individual’s immunity ( as explained earlier). If an individual
is at the peak of his/her age and suffers from co-morbidities, comes under the infectious criterion, Vis, a certain blood group, body type, and follows a certain lifestyle.
There are his a high chance that a new mutation can emerge from such an
individual. To which there are several reasons, vis good immunity, but poor
management, bad lifestyle, etc.
Is there a way out?
While it is always said that
there is always a way out, and there is a solution to every problem, this
is a bit complex one. Or, are we just making it more complex? While the
scientist are working day and night to make an effective vaccination, there doesn’t
seem to be a way out unless a new methodology to develop vaccination is
devised, today we need a vaccination which would either cut off the supply of
basic ingredients to the virus or say the basic energy source and hit the virus
when its weak. When such a vaccination is devised or made, we have a generic
medicine which can tackle any virus, no matter how dangerous, but since the basic
structure of the virus is attacked, it has minimal chances to survive and hence
reproduce nay mutate.
But, the question we need to ask
ourselves is, is such a vaccination possible?
Well, for now, it just seems to be
a theory, and no literature could be found on ways to isolate essentiasuppliesly
to the virus, making it weaker and killing it, but many research studies are being conducted as of now, which are trying to figure out how to do this.

Comments
Post a Comment